Legal Opinion

Boland v. Claudel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1914No. 22,274PublishedCited by 30 opinions

From Perry Circuit Court; William, Ridley, Judge. Action by Francis Michael Claudel and others against William V. Boland and others. From a judgment for plaintiffs, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtErwin, J.

This was a proceeding to contest the will of Peter Claudel, and to set aside the probate thereof, brought by appellees against appellants, which resulted by the verdict of the jury, in setting aside the will on the ground that said Claudel was of unsound mind at the time he undertook to execute his will. The appellants assign as error here, (1) the court erred in sustaining appellees’ motion to strike from the files said appellants’ answer in abatement; (2) the court erred in overruling the motion of the appellants, except Edward C. James, for a new trial.

1

2

*297 3.

*296No question is raised as to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Watts v. SweeneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Eel River Railroad v. State ex rel. KistlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. GranthamIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SimpsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Brink v. ReidIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Chicago & Erie Railroad v. DiniusIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State v. GlassNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Palmer v. BeallIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Roe v. DoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Gray v. McLaughlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1921

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API