Legal Opinion

Glidden v. Henry

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1885No. 12,288PublishedCited by 31 opinions

From, the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.

For value and before maturity, appellee became the owner of two promissory notes, executed by appellant, one of which is as follows:

“ $750. Newcastle, Ink., April 14, 1883.
“ Twelve months after date we, or either of us, promise to pay to the order of George W. Nugen, Jr., seven hundred and fifty dollars, with interest at the rate of seven per cent, per annum after date until paid, and attorney fees, value received, without any relief whatever from valuation or appraisement laws, with.eight per cent, interest from maturity. The drawers and endorsers severally waive presentment for payment,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Costelo v. CrowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  2. Walker v. WoollenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Woodbury v. RobertsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  4. Smith v. BlarcomMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Cook v. SatterleeNew York Supreme Court · 1826

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Avirett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  2. Moore v. SargentIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Carroll County Savings Bank v. StrotherSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1888
  4. Roe v. DoeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. City National Bank v. Gunter Bros.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1903

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API