Legal Opinion

Strozier v. Williams

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1960No. Civ. 24861PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINCAID, J. pro tern. *

Appeal is taken from a judgment of dismissal following the sustaining of a demurrer to plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint without leave to amend. Defendants had interposed both general and special demurrers to the original and to each of the amended complaints of plaintiff. Upon the overruling of the general demurrer and the sustaining of the special demurrer to the third amended complaint plaintiff was given leave to amend. He thereupon filed a fourth amended complaint identical with his third amended complaint. In response to defendants’ demurrer plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Columbia Pictures Corp. v. DeTothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Smith v. Kern County Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Foster v. Masters Pontiac Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Longshore v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Southern Counties Gas Co. v. Ventura Pipeline Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Moya v. NorthrupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API