Legal Opinion

Southern Counties Gas Co. v. Ventura Pipeline Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 20, 1971No. Civ. 37749PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

LILLIE, J.

Since May of 1949, pursuant to a series of so-called master contracts, defendant has installed underground utility pipelines for use by plaintiff in the transmission of natural gas. However, contrary to a specification in the contract to that effect, defendant in several instances failed to apply protective coating or wrapping, thus hastening the process of corrosion. Commencing in July of 1967, gas leaks were reported at several locations; investigation revealed that they were caused by corrosion due to the above coating or wrapping deficiency. Immediate repairs were made on…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Eye Dog Foundation v. State Board of Guide Dogs for the BlindCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Crestview Cemetery Ass'n v. DiedenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Di Giorgio Fruit Corp. v. Department of EmploymentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Harvey Machine Co. v. HatzelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cook v. CraigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plastics United States, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Lewis v. Seventeenth District Agricultural Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Cardellini v. CaseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Fineberg v. NiekerkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API