Legal Opinion
Putnam v. Pickwick Stages, Northern Division, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 13, 1929No. Docket No. 6697PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANDIS, J., pro tem.
This action is one for damages resulting from an automobile accident.
The cause was tried by jury and verdict for $7,500 returned in favor of the plaintiff.
Judgment was thereupon entered in favor of the plaintiff for the damages so assessed by the jury.
The appeals of the defendant are from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
Appellant bases its appeals upon the following five grounds:
1. The evidence does not justify the verdict, (a) The proof discloses no negligence on the part of defendant, (b) Defendant was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Baker v. JosephCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Kelley v. Hodge Transportation SystemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- O'Connor v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Townsend v. ButterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Arnold v. SkaggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Crooks v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Smith v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Poncino v. Sierra Nevada Life & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Rowe v. RennickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- Johnson v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.