Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Pearson
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 5, 1929No. Docket No. 6964PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.
This is an action for damages for personal injuries. The case was tried before a jury which returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $4,000. From the judgment entered upon this verdict the defendant, George C. Pearson, prosecutes this appeal.
An automobile driven by plaintiff collided with an automobile driven by defendant at the intersection of Peralta Avenue and School Street in the city of Oakland. As a result of the collision, plaintiff was thrown through the glass •window of her automobile and sustained the following injuries: Her face was lacerated and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
- O'Connor v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Warren v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Townsend v. ButterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Isaac & Rebecca Thomas v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Crooks v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Sandoval v. Southern California Enterprises Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1950
- Laubscher v. BlakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Raynale v. Yellow Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Comstock v. MorseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.