O'Connor v. United R.R. of S.F.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Wm. M. Abbott, Wm. M. Cannon, and Kingsley W. Cannon, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This is an action for personal injuries in which plaintiff had a verdict and judgment. Defendant appeals from the judgment and an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The first claim of appellant for a reversal is based on the refusal of the trial court to grant its motion for a nonsuit.
Plaintiff, on the afternoon of February 13,1909, was driving a hotel bus with a gentle team of horses along the southerly line of Mission Street between Fifth and Sixth streets, in the city of San Francisco. He was traveling along slowly, the wheels of the bus being a foot or fourteen inches from the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Driscoll v. Market Street Cable RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Clark v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Vincent v. Norton & Taunton Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
- Shea v. Potrero & Bay View RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Gornstein v. PriverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- Mula v. MeyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Crooks v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Lowenthal v. MortimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Renshaw v. CountessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.