Legal Opinion
Crooks v. White
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 22, 1930No. Docket No. 7182PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The plaintiffs W.L. Crooks and Fannie Crooks, husband and wife, brought this action against the defendant Henry White for damages for causing the death of their adult son, Walter Crooks.
The case was tried before a jury, which returned a verdict for defendant. From the judgment entered upon this verdict the plaintiffs prosecute this appeal.
On the night of June 18, 1928, defendant was driving his father's automobile from Oakland to Benicia, and Walter Crooks, the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Wilbur v. WilburCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Druzanich v. CrileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Ornales v. WiggerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Anderson v. I. M. Jameson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Barger v. ChelponSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.