Baker v. Joseph
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Twelfth District. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The motion for nonsuit was made on the ground that the evidence did not support or prove a right to recover on either.count. Verdict for plaintiff, judgment accordingly. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
—Cope, J. and Field, C. J. concurring.
This suit was brought to recover of the defendant several sums of money, which the plaintiff alleges the defendant owes him and refuses to pay. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff, being about to leave this State for the East, in April, 1854, deposited with the defendant some $6,000, to be invested by the latter for him in loans at interest, and the principal and interest to be paid to plaintiff on request. That *176when he returned, December 1st, 1858, he demanded the money of the defendant, who refused to pay. The complaint avers that the defendant did…
2Cited by59 opinions
- Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Title Ins. and Trust Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. SuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Daley v. RussCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Heintz v. CooperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.