Legal Opinion

Chetwood v. California National Bank

California Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1896No. S. F. No. 177PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. D. J. Murphy, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This is an appeal from the judgment alone.

Plaintiff, as a stockholder of the California National Bank, prosecuted this action against certain directors of the bank to recover from them, for the use and benefit of the corporation, the sum of four hundred thousand dollars, alleged to have been lost to the corporation by their negligent misconduct in the management of its affairs.

The bank had become insolvent before the commencement of the action, and a receiver was in charge of its affairs. Plaintiff made demand upon the comptroller of the currency, upon the receiver, upon the corporation, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. Clay St. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Merritt v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Urton v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Bryan v. TormeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Putnam v. LamphierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown SunnyvaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Fowden v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Black v. MartinMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Lamoreux v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API