Black v. Martin
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Citing in support of appellant's contention that an agreement not to sue one joint tort-feasor which expressly reserves the right to sue another joint tort-feasor, does not operate as a discharge of the tort-feasor thus expressly excluded: Carey v.Bilby, 129 Fed. 203, 63 C.C.A. 361; Berry v. Pullman Co., 249 Fed. 816, L.R.A. 1918F, 358, 162 C.C.A. 50; Barnett v.Conklin, 268 Fed. 177; The Thomas P. Beal, (1924) 298 Fed. 121; Gamble v. Brown, (1928) 29 F.2d 366; The RossCoddington, (1930) 40 F.2d 280; Steenhuis v. Holland, (1927) 217 Ala. 105, 115 So. 2; Wright v. McCord, (1920),205 Ala. 122,…
2Cases cited93 opinions
- Gilbert v. . FinchNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Dwy v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
- Ellis v. EssonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
- Abb v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
- Matheson v. O'KaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- McKenna v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- In re W.R. Grace & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Morton v. MooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Azure Ex Rel. Marchington v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- Gronquist v. OlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.