Blickman Turkus v. Mf Downtown Sunnyvale
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUSHING, P. J.
The primary question in this case is whether a realtor who represented the lessee in a complex commercial lease transaction had a duty to inform the lessor, after the lease was signed but before the lessee took possession, that the lessee’s ability to perform the conditions of the lease was jeopardized by its deteriorating financial condition. The trial court held that the lessor had failed to plead facts sufficient to establish any duty on the realtor’s part to disclose this information. We find no error in this determination. Nor do we find any error in the trial…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Santisas v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Ryan Operations G.P., a Virginia General Partnership and Nvr, L.P., a Virginia Limited Partnership, on Behalf of Its Division, Nvr Building Products Co. v. Santiam-Midwest Lumber Co., an Oregon Corporation Furman Lumber, Inc., a Massachusetts Corporation Bright Wood Corp., an Oregon Corporation. Bright Wood Corp., Third Party v. Forrest Paint Co., Inc., an Oregon Corporation Guardsman Products, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Third Party Ryan Operations G.P. And Nvr, L.P. And Its Division, Nvr Building Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Rosal v. First Federal Bank of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Bernardi v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Jones v. ConocoPhillips Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Apex LLC v. Korusfood.comCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.