Bryan v. Tormey
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
The land in controversy in this action is part of a Mexican grant patented to the Peraltas in 1877. In 1859, one Jurgo, being.owner by conveyance from the Peraltas of a part of the grant, sold and conveyed two adjoining parcels to the brothers John and Peter Mathews respectively.
There was a map of the Peralta grant, known as ICellersberger’s map of the ranchos of Vicente and Domingo Peralta, upon which the different subdivisions were designated by numbers, subdivision 56 being north of and adjoining subdivision 53. The conveyance from Jurgo to John Mathews included 53 and the south 27.41…
2Cited by15 opinions
- Chetwood v. California National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Childs v. PtomeyMontana Supreme Court · 1896
- Tuffree v. PolhemusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Buchner v. MalloyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Ford v. FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.