Legal Opinion

Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1985No. L.A. 31996PublishedCited by 211 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

We consider whether a plaintiff may pursue a tort action against a parent corporation on the theory that it is the alter ego of its subsidiary, the alleged tortfeasor, after entering into a settlement and release agreement with the subsidiary. At issue is the applicability of Code of Civil Procedure section 877,1 which abrogates the common law rule that settle*295ment with one alleged tortfeasor bars action against any others claimed liable for the same injury. We conclude that the statute does apply, and thus release of an alleged tortfeasor under these circumstances does not…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Estate of McDillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Automotriz Del Golfo De California v. ResnickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Hinman v. Westinghouse Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Rodgers v. Kemper Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by211 opinions

  1. Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. People v. Christian S.California Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Neilson v. Union Bank of California, N.A.District Court, C.D. California · 2003
  4. Frank Lumpkin v. Envirodyne Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  5. Troyk v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

206 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API