Legal Opinion

Schendel v. Hennepin County Medical Center

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1992No. C0-91-964PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellants Dr. Mahmoud Nagib and Neurosurgical Associates, Ltd. challenge the trial court’s denial of JNOV, alleging respondent Roger Schendel failed to prove the existence of a physician-patient relationship while Schendel was a patient at Hennepin County Medical Center and claim that errors in the verdict form and instructions to the jury, evidentiary errors, and the jury’s award of excessive and speculative damages require a new trial. Appellants also contend that the trial court erred as a matter of law in holding them liable for the entire amount of damages. We…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Frey Ex Rel. Frey v. SnelgroveSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Hill v. Okay Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  4. Jack Frost, Inc. v. Engineered Building Components Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. GaravaliaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McKinney v. SchlatterOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Mead v. Legacy Health SystemOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Warren v. DinterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
  4. Lownsbury v. Vanburen, Unpublished Decision (8-2-2000)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Mead v. Legacy Health SystemOregon Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API