Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lownsbury v. Vanburen, Unpublished Decision (8-2-2000)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 2000No. C.A. No. 19365Unpublished

1Dissent

Because I disagree with the majority opinion's holding that no physician-patient relationship was established between Dr. Stover and Lownsbury and Rebecca, I must respectfully dissent.

The majority declines to recognize a physician-patient relationship in situations where a physician had no knowledge of a patient's existence. However, once a physician-patient relationship has been established by contract, as in the present case, whether the physician actually knows that the patient is in the hospital is irrelevant.

Deposition testimony established that Dr. Stover was the attending physician on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tracy v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Mozingo v. Pitt County Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Schendel v. Hennepin County Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API