Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mead v. Legacy Health System

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2012No. CC 0402-01947; CA A130969; SC S058268Published

1DissentWalters, J.

It is undisputed that defendant agreed, as a condition of obtaining hospital privileges, to serve as an on-call physician and respond to calls for advice and assistance from emergency room physicians. It is also undisputed that on July 1, 2002, in that capacity, defendant received a call from an emergency room physician seeking, in defendant’s own words, his advice “to determine at this time whether the patient needs to be seen by a neurosurgeon.”1 Defendant took the call; obtained the results of plaintiff’s physical, neurological, and MRI examinations;2 determined the nature of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fazzolari v. Portland School District No. 1JOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Reynosa v. Huff, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
  3. Dowell v. MossbergOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Hill v. KokoskyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Currey v. ButcherOregon Supreme Court · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API