Legal Opinion

Mead v. Legacy Health System

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 2012No. CC 0402-01947; CA A130969; SC S058268PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.

An emergency room doctor telephoned defendant (an on-call neurosurgeon) to ask his advice about plaintiff, who had come into the emergency room for treatment. When plaintiff later sued defendant for malpractice, the jury returned a verdict in defendant’s favor; the jury found that defendant was not acting as plaintiff’s doctor and, as a result, owed her no duty. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the trial court should have directed a verdict in plaintiff’s favor on that issue. Mead v. Legacy Health System, 231 Or App 451, 464, 220 P3d 118 (2009). We allowed defendant’s petition for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. St. John v. PopeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Thompson v. Sun City Community Hospital, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Lyons v. GretherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  4. White v. Jubitz Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Dowell v. MossbergOregon Supreme Court · 1961

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Klutschkowski v. PeaceHealthOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Vasquez v. Double Press Mfg., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Tomlinson v. Metropolitan Pediatrics, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Stone v. WittCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  5. Regence Group v. Tig Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API