Reay v. Butler
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing to vacate the judgment. The facts are stated in the opinion-of the-court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
On the 20th of February, 1866, the plaintiff commenced an action to recover of defendants possession of a lot of land situate in the city and county of San Francisco. The complaint is in the usual form in the action of ejectment, so called, in this state.
To this complaint the defendants, by J. P. Treadwell, as their attorney, filed an answer.
The answer denies each and every allegation of the complaint, and then proceeds for a further and separate answer to aver that J. P. Treadwell at all times in the complaint mentioned and long before was and ever since has been and still is the owner of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Eastin v. Bank of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Dutton v. WarschauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Valentine v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Calderwood v. BrooksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Doyle v. FranklinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- People v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Harper v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Van Camp v. EmeryIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
- Nord v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.