Goyhinech v. Goyhinech
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County refusing to set aside a judgment. Motion to dismiss appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
This was an action for divorce. Judgment passed for the plaintiff. After the judgment had been entered, the defendant moved the trial court to set such judgment aside, on the ground that no findings had been made. This motion was denied, and the defendant appeals from the order denying such motion. The plaintiff moves to dismiss this appeal, and we think that the motion should be granted.
The motion was not for a new trial, but was merely to set aside the judgment. And the judgment was itself appealable. It is settled that when a judgment or order is itself appealable the appeal must…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coombs v. Hibberd.California Supreme Court · 1872
- Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Tripp v. Santa Rosa Street R.R.California Supreme Court · 1886
- Larkin v. LarkinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Natoma Water & Mining Co. v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Title Ins. Trust Co. v. Calif. Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Harper v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Kent v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Alpers v. BlissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Hernaiz Targa & Co. v. VivasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1914
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.