Legal Opinion

Scherger v. Northern Natural Gas Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 1998No. CX-96-2319PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAGE, Justice.

Norbert and Delores Scherger (the “Schergers”) petitioned the Dodge County District Court for a writ of mandamus 1 requiring Northern Natural Gas Co. (“Northern”) to initiate condemnation proceedings in order to replace an existing Northern pipeline located within an easement on the Schergers’ property. After cross-motions for summary judgment on stipulated facts, the district court denied the Schergers’ motion seeking to require Northern to initiate-condemnation proceedings and granted Northern’s motion, which sought to have the Schergers’ action dismissed. On appeal,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. McIntosh v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Romanchuk v. PlotkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Mielke v. Yellowstone Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Minneapolis Athletic Club v. CohlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  2. Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  3. Village of Wagon Mound v. Mora TrustNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Jeffrey Apitz v. Terry HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  5. Atmos Energy Corporation v. Charles L. Paul, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2020

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API