Scherger v. Northern Natural Gas Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAGE, Justice.
Norbert and Delores Scherger (the “Schergers”) petitioned the Dodge County District Court for a writ of mandamus 1 requiring Northern Natural Gas Co. (“Northern”) to initiate condemnation proceedings in order to replace an existing Northern pipeline located within an easement on the Schergers’ property. After cross-motions for summary judgment on stipulated facts, the district court denied the Schergers’ motion seeking to require Northern to initiate-condemnation proceedings and granted Northern’s motion, which sought to have the Schergers’ action dismissed. On appeal,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cherne Industrial, Inc. v. Grounds & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- McIntosh v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Romanchuk v. PlotkinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Mielke v. Yellowstone Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Minneapolis Athletic Club v. CohlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Village of Wagon Mound v. Mora TrustNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Jeffrey Apitz v. Terry HopkinsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Atmos Energy Corporation v. Charles L. Paul, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.