Jeffrey Apitz v. Terry Hopkins
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
This appeal is from a summary judgment granted to respondent-owners of a dominant estate in a declaratory judgment action brought by appellant-owners of the servient estate to determine the scope of an “exclusive easement for ingress, egress and utility purposes.” Because the language granting the easement is ambiguous and the' interpretation of the easement grant presents a question of fact, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
Appellants Jeffrey and Joanne Apitz own property in Itasca County that is described as Lot 2, Block 1, Bluffs of Shoal Lake (Lot 2). Respondents Terry…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Donnay v. BoulwareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Larson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- Latham v. GarnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Citizens State Bank v. Raven Trading Partners, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matthew & Amy Johnson v. Lake Cushman Maintenance Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018