Legal Opinion

Kenney v. Parks

California Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1898No. L. A. No. 405PublishedCited by 30 opinions

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. W. B. Cope, Judge, The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Motion to dismiss the appeal. Judgment was rendered herein May 26, 1896, in favor of the plaintiff, correcting and reforming a deed of conveyance to her of certain property, and declaring its effect, and also declaring her to be the owner of certain lands and entitled to recover the possession thereof from the defendants, and giving her also a money judgment against two of the defendants. ■ The action was brought against thirty defendants, of whom thirteen appeared and answered the complaint, and the other seventeen made no appearance, and the judgment was rendered against them upon their…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ryer v. RyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Harper v. HildrethCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. In re Estate of BabyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Morton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Randall v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Reitano v. YankwichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Schubert v. ReichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Levin v. SaroffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Preluzsky v. Pacific Co-Operative Cafeteria Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Central Montana Stockyards v. FraserMontana Supreme Court · 1957

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API