Legal Opinion
Luliewicz v. Eastern Malleable Iron Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 16, 1940PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
On June 14, 1935, the compensation commissioner denied the application of the plaintiff’s decedent for compensation from the defendant on a claim of disability from contracting silicosis, which arose out of and in the course of his employment by it.. The decedent died February 7, 1939, and an autopsy performed shortly thereafter afforded evidence as to the condition of his lungs, material upon the question of whether or not he had been afflicted with this disease. Confining his decision solely to the plaintiff’s motion to reopen the award on the ground of this newly discovered evidence, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Banca Commerciale Italiana Trust Co. v. Westchester Artistic Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Batesville v. BallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
- Stamford Dock & Realty Corp. v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Russell Lumber Co. v. J. E. Smith & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Schieffelin & Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Guerin v. NortonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Ostroski v. OstroskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
- Lisee v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Commissioner of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.