Legal Opinion
Ostroski v. Ostroski
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 18, 1949PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
No appearance was entered for the defendant in this divorce action, and on December 22, 1948, judgment was rendered for the plaintiff. Subsequently, on the motion of the defendant, the judgment was opened, on the ground that she had consulted counsel but by accident or inadvertence no appearance for her was entered, and that counsel believed she had a good defense. From the order opening the judgment the plaintiff has filed an appeal. The defendant moves to erase it upon the ground that the order was not such a final judgment as can be made the basis of an appeal.
The test for determining…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morrill v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- State v. KempSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Felletter v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Lusas v. St. Patrick's Roman Catholic Church Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Ferguson v. SaboSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ral Management, Inc. v. Valley View AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Cichy v. KostykSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Hoberman v. Lake of Isles, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- State v. FaheySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Solomon v. KeiserSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.