Legal Opinion
Lisee v. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 6, 2001No. SC 16419PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The defendant, Aetna Retirement Services, Inc. (Aetna),1 appeals from the trial court’s order remanding the administrative appeal of the plaintiff, Deborah Lisee, from the decision of the named defendant, the commission on human rights and opportuni*531ties (commission), dismissing the plaintiffs disability discrimination complaint against Aetna, the plaintiffs former employer. On appeal, Aetna claims that the remand order was not statutorily authorized and that the trial court exceeded its statutory authority in failing to affirm the commission’s decision to dismiss the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Watson v. HowardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Rumbin v. Utica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Weinberg v. ARA Vending Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Schieffelin & Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. LawSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Doe v. Connecticut Bar Examining CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Insurance v. Underwriters at Lloyd's & Companies CollectiveSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.