Legal Opinion

Schieffelin & Co. v. Department of Liquor Control

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 3, 1987No. 12921; 12922PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The dispositive issue in these cases is whether this administrative appeal was finally adjudicated, for purposes of appeal to this court, when the trial court remanded the case for administrative resolution of an issue which the administrative tribunal had failed to adjudicate. We hold that there was no final judgment, and therefore dismiss this appeal.

The underlying litigation arose out of efforts by the plaintiff, Schieffelin & Co., to terminate the distributorships of several liquor wholesale licensees, including the defendants Brescóme Distributing Corporation and Eder Brothers, Inc. Its…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Watson v. HowardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Laurel Park, Inc. v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. Doublewal Corp. v. ToffolonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Schieffelin & Co. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Lieberman v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  3. Convalescent Center of Bloomfield, Inc. v. Department of Income MaintenanceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Szudora v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. DubnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API