Legal Opinion

Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority v. Commissioner of Environmental Protection

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 13, 1995No. 15013; 15014; 15015; 15016PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The dispositive issue in these four administrative appeals is whether this court has jurisdiction to review the judgments of a trial court that sustained the plaintiffs’ administrative appeals but ordered a remand for further administrative proceedings. Determination of that issue turns primarily on the date when the defendant Riley Energy Systems of Lisbon Corporation (RESOL) began administrative proceedings for permission to build a solid waste resources recovery facility in the town of Lisbon. If the administrative proceedings were initiated at a time when the governing statute was General…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  2. Kaufman v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Watson v. HowardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  4. Lieberman v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Chestnut Realty, Inc. v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Brookridge District Ass'n v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. Lisee v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Ensign-Bickford Realty Corp. v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  5. Automated Salvage Transport, Inc. v. Wheelabrator Environmental Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API