Legal Opinion

State v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 4, 2019No. 112449PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 112,449 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. DUSTIN DEAN PERKINS, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Neither the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution nor § 15 of the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights addresses the proper remedy for a warrantless search; the exclusionary rule is a judicially created remedy designed to deter unlawful searches and seizures by prohibiting the prosecution's use of unconstitutionally obtained evidence. 2. Ordinarily, issues not raised before the trial court cannot be raised on appeal. There are three…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Birchfield v. N. Dakota. William Robert BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  5. Hudson v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. GraySupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  2. State v. HilyardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  3. In re N.E.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  4. City of Kingman v. ArySupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  5. State v. HeimSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API