State v. Gray
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 117,747 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MARVIN L. GRAY, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The decision to review an unpreserved claim under an exception is a prudential one. Even if an exception would support a decision to review a new claim, this court has no obligation to do so. 2. Kansas courts presume jury members follow instructions, including limiting instructions regarding the admission and use of prior crimes evidence. Appeal from Sedgwick District Court; JEFFREY E. GOERING, judge. Opinion filed February 28, 2020. Affirmed. Michelle A.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
- State v. GodfreySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- Pierce v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- State v. HebertSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- State v. MendezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
- In re Adoption of Baby Girl G.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2020
- State v. HillardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- State v. HachmeisterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
- State v. HolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.