Legal Opinion

State v. Gray

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 28, 2020No. 117747PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 117,747 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MARVIN L. GRAY, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. The decision to review an unpreserved claim under an exception is a prudential one. Even if an exception would support a decision to review a new claim, this court has no obligation to do so. 2. Kansas courts presume jury members follow instructions, including limiting instructions regarding the admission and use of prior crimes evidence. Appeal from Sedgwick District Court; JEFFREY E. GOERING, judge. Opinion filed February 28, 2020. Affirmed. Michelle A.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2012
  2. State v. GodfreySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. Pierce v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. State v. HebertSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State v. MendezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  2. In re Adoption of Baby Girl G.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  3. State v. HillardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  4. State v. HachmeisterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  5. State v. HolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 2022

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API