Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Michigan
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 15, 2006No. 04-1360PublishedCited by 1,033 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
We decide whether violation of the “knock-and-announce” rule requires the suppression of all evidence found in the search.
I
Police obtained a warrant authorizing a search for drugs and firearms at the home of petitioner Booker Hudson. They discovered both. Large quantities of drugs were found, including cocaine rocks in Hudson’s pocket. A loaded gun was lodged between the cushion and armrest of the chair in which he was sitting. Hudson was charged under Michigan law with unlawful drug and firearm possession.
This case is before us only because of the method of entry into the house. When the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,033 opinions
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Corley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Fred Snow, Marcus Snow, Rahad RossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
1,028 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.