Legal Opinion

In re N.E.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 9, 2022No. 123599PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 123,599 In the Interest of N.E., a Minor Child. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Appellate courts have only the jurisdiction provided by law. That means appellate courts lack jurisdiction to review a district court's decision unless a party has appealed in the time and manner specified by law. Whether jurisdiction exists is a question of law subject to unlimited review. 2. K.S.A. 38-2273(a) governs appellate jurisdiction under the Revised Kansas Code for the Care of Children, K.S.A. 38-2201 et seq. That statute limits appealable orders to any order of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State v. GodfreySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  2. Nauheim v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  3. Double M Construction, Inc. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  4. State v. MarshSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. State v. Spencer Gifts, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Monarch Build v. DLH HoldingsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025
  2. State v. KemmerlySupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  3. Schutt v. FosterSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025
  4. State v. GatewoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 2026
  5. Zaragoza v. Board of Johnson County Comm'rsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API