Legal Opinion

State v. Hilyard

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 19, 2022No. 123323PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 123,323 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. RACHAEL C. HILYARD, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Premeditation may be shown by circumstantial evidence, provided inferences from that evidence are reasonable. 2. Sufficient evidence, even circumstantial, need not rise to such a degree of certainty that it excludes any and every other reasonable conclusion. 3. A defendant must consent to the use of a guilt-based defense, but that consent need not be on the record. 4. Absent a request from the defendant, this court need not remand a case for an…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  2. State v. GodfreySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. State v. Van CleaveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. State v. ScaifeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. ZongkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  2. State v. ColemanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  3. State v. DotsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  4. In re D.J.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2025
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API