Legal Opinion

City of Kingman v. Ary

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 20, 2020No. 114413PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 114,413 CITY OF KINGMAN, Appellee, v. RONALD S. ARY, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT Applying State v. Perkins, 310 Kan. 764,

449 P.3d 756

(2019), to the circumstances of this case, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies and allowed the district court to consider the results of a blood test for blood alcohol content even though the Kansas Supreme Court would later hold that K.S.A. 2013 Supp. 8-1025 was unconstitutional. Review of the judgment of the Court of Appeals in an unpublished opinion filed December 15, 2017. Appeal from…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  5. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. Alfaro-ValledaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. Peo v. TarrColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. State v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API