Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Wright

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 5, 1929No. 18963PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIEEENDAFEFER, C.

This is an action brought by defendant in error, hereinafter designated as plaintiff, against Oakland Lodge No. 74, A. F. & A. M., an unincorporated association, and Tom Alexander, A. A. Kelley, E. Simmons, Geo. L. Sneed, and R. C. Barnette, as trustees of said lodge, and W. I. Dowell, J. L. Hemphill, R. C. Barnette, F. Simmons and A. A. Kelley, as individuals, hereinafter designated as defendants, to recover the sum of $624.37, principal and interest on a promissory note.

The note sued upon is dated January 8, 1924, for the principal sum of $500, payable to the order of John…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Keokuk Falls Improvement Co. v. Kingsland & Douglas Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
  2. Janes v. Citizens BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  3. Cole v. KinchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Nix v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Wommer v. WommerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. MattesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Dormont Savings & Trust Co. v. KommerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Skinner v. BowlanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Kilpatrick v. PlummerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Neu v. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API