Legal Opinion

Nix v. Green

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 31, 1923No. 11743PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.

This action was brought by the defendants in error, Mary I. Green and Martin Moore, against W. B. Nix, plaintiff in error, to cancel of record a certain affidavit which plaintiff in error had placed of record in the office of the county clerk of Hughes county, which affected the title of said lands of defendants in error, and to quiet title to said lands. The parties will hereinafter be referred to as “plaintiffs” and “defendant”, as they appeared in the trial court.

The defendant filed his answer and cross-petition, consisting of some 20 or 25 pages, which we will not set out in full, but…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Von Trotha v. BambergerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  2. Schuber v. McDuffeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Gorman v. CarlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Haynes, Admx. v. City Nat. Bank of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Yoder v. Randol NixSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. MattesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Ganas v. TselosSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  3. Alexander v. WrightSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  4. Bagg v. OsbornSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Catlett v. JordanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API