Legal Opinion

Keokuk Falls Improvement Co. v. Kingsland & Douglas Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 4, 1896PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from the district court of Oklahoma, County.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dale, C. J.:

This was a suit instituted in the district court of Oklahoma county on October 14, 189á, by the Kingsland & Douglas Manufacturing Co., to recover judgment upon three promissory notes against the Keokuk Falls Improvement Co., et al, in the sum of $1,795.50 and interest, The record in this case shows that October 31, 1891, the Keokuk Falls Improvement Co,, executed to the Kingsland & Douglas Manufacturing Co., a corporation under and existing by virtue of the laws of Missouri, three promissory notes, in the sum of $700 each, which notes were,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Stackpole v. ArnoldMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. Pentz v. StantonNew York Supreme Court · 1833
  3. Tucker Manufacturing Co. v. FairbanksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  4. Hobson v. HassettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Weller v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. New York Casualty Co. v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  2. Williamson v. WinninghamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Toon v. McCawWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Leader Printing Co. v. LowrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ada v. WomackSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API