Legal Opinion
Kilpatrick v. Plummer
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 8, 1930No. 19588PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EAGLETON, C.
Mrs. ML M. Plummer brought suit naming Garnet A. Kilpatrick and ML M. Plummer, trustees, and the Henryetta Oil & Gas Company defendants. The cause of action was founded upon the following note:
“When Due Demand No.______ $3500/00
“Henryetta, Okla., 3/31, 1928
“On demand after date, for value received, I, • we, or either of us, promise to pay to order of Mrs. W. M. Plumer three thousand and five hundred and no-100 dollars payable at Henryetta, Okla., with interest at the rate of ten per cent, per annum from__until paid, with ten per cent additional as attorney’s fees should this note…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Megowan v. . PetersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Jump v. SparlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Lee v. LittleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Briel v. Exchange Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Home Insurance Co. of N.Y. v. WhitchurchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jennings v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Gassin v. McJunkinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- United States v. RemusCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Cannon v. Miller Rubber Products Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- Coburn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.