Legal Opinion

Condas v. Condas

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1980No. 15669PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

Plaintiffs, who are cousins of the individual defendants, brought this action to compel defendants to remove two gates constructed across a road in White Pine Canyon, Summit County, which barred access to real property owned by plaintiffs. Plaintiffs alleged that they either have a prescriptive easement to use the road as it crosses defendants’ property, or the road is a public roadway, and cannot be barred by defendants.

The District Court for Summit County, sitting without a jury, found that the road is a public roadway, and ordered defendants to remove the gates. The Court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mecham v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  2. Stanton v. StantonUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Sullivan Et Ux. v. CondasUtah Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Maytime Manor, Inc. v. Stokermatic, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Provo City v. LambertUtah Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mascaro v. DavisUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough v. DawsonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Salt Lake City v. Silver Fork Pipeline Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Stevensen v. GoodsonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Clark v. Deloitte & Touche LLPUtah Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API