Legal Opinion

Salt Lake City v. Silver Fork Pipeline Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1995No. 940212PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Justice:

Silver Fork Pipeline Corporation is comprised of property owners in the Silver Fork area of Big Cottonwood Canyon. It appeals from an order of summary judgment in a quiet title action initiated by Salt Lake City. At the heart of the dispute is the allocation of rights to water collected in the Kentucky-Utah mine tunnel. Each party claims the right to collect and divert water from this source. Salt Lake City argues that the water, which it alleges would be tributary to Big Cottonwood Creek if the opening to the mine tunnel did not trap it, properly belongs to it pursuant to two…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bonham v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Total Petroleum, Inc. v. Gary J. Davis, D/B/A Gary J. Davis Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  3. Ron Shepherd Insurance, Inc. v. ShieldsUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Tracy Loan & Trust Co. v. Openshaw Inv. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Lawson Ex Rel. Lawson v. Salt Lake Trappers, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Jones, Waldo, Holbrook & McDonough v. DawsonUtah Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Stevensen v. GoodsonUtah Supreme Court · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API