Mecham v. City of Glendale
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HATHAWAY, Judge.
Appellants filed a complaint for declaratory judgment and have taken this appeal from the judgment entered on defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The defendants’ ground for their motion, which was accepted by the trial court, was the doctrine of res judicata. Although we have grave doubts as to the sufficiency of the complaint, see Lecky v. Staley, 6 Ariz. App. 556, 435 P.2d 63 (1967); Riley v. County of Cochise, 10 Ariz.App. 55, 455 P.2d 1005 (1969), we do not inquire into the question as we believe that relief was appropriately denied.
The instant litigation concerns a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Adams v. BearArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Monroe County Motor Co. v. Tennessee Odin Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1950
- Riley v. County of CochiseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- Martin v. WoodArizona Supreme Court · 1951
- In Re Estate of CohenArizona Supreme Court · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jackson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Standage Ventures, Inc. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Gilbert v. Ben-AsherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- International Resources v. DunfieldUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Condas v. CondasUtah Supreme Court · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.