Maytime Manor, Inc. v. Stokermatic, Inc.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Justice:
Defendants appeal from judgment granted plaintiff on its complaint to reform a léase by the District Court for Salt Lake County, sitting without a jury. Affirmed. Costs to plaintiff.
Defendants began negotiating with plaintiff’s agent, Lenord Sproul, in the fall of 1971 to purchase or lease the Maytime Man- or Convalescent Center in Salt Lake City. On September 20, 1972, defendants submitted to Mr. Sproul a written proposal to lease the convalescent center. Before he submitted the proposal to plaintiff’s board of directors, several changes were handwritten into the proposal…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1957
- Sine v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1950
- Pagano v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1975
- Jensen v. Manila Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- Naisbitt v. HodgesUtah Supreme Court · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Condas v. CondasUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Wilson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
- Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance. Co. v. MardanlouUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Wilson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010