Legal Opinion

Maytime Manor, Inc. v. Stokermatic, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1979No. 15975PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

Defendants appeal from judgment granted plaintiff on its complaint to reform a léase by the District Court for Salt Lake County, sitting without a jury. Affirmed. Costs to plaintiff.

Defendants began negotiating with plaintiff’s agent, Lenord Sproul, in the fall of 1971 to purchase or lease the Maytime Man- or Convalescent Center in Salt Lake City. On September 20, 1972, defendants submitted to Mr. Sproul a written proposal to lease the convalescent center. Before he submitted the proposal to plaintiff’s board of directors, several changes were handwritten into the proposal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nokes v. Continental Mining & Milling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Sine v. HarperUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Pagano v. WalkerUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Jensen v. Manila Corp. of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day SaintsUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Naisbitt v. HodgesUtah Supreme Court · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Condas v. CondasUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Wilson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010
  3. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance. Co. v. MardanlouUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Wilson v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API