Ireland v. Marsden
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WARMER, J., pro tem.
The facts are not in dispute. They may be briefly stated as follows: That respondent and her husband were residents of Grand Forks, North Dakota. Dr. Marsden, the appellant, and his family were formerly residents of the same city and had been neighbors of the respondent and her husband for many years. Respondent and her husband were visiting in California. On Thursday preceding February 5, 1927, respondent went to La Jolla to visit her old neighbors and friends for a day or two. There was to be a picnic of the former residents of North Dakota, to be held in Sycamore Grove,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Judson v. Giant Powder Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Ryder v. BambergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Michener v. HuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Scarborough v. UrgoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Crooks v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Nevarov v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Druzanich v. CrileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Potts v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
- Anderson v. I. M. Jameson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Mudrick v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.