Legal Opinion

Delaney v. Cade

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 22, 1994No. 69,355PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Holmes, C.J.:

This case is before the court on questions certified by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, K.S.A. 60-3201 et seq.

Chief Judge Stephanie K. Seymour, Circuit Judge presiding, has certified to this court the following questions:

“1. Does Kansas recognize a cause of action for loss of chance of recovery? “2. If so, what are the standards of proof for such a claim?”

Although the facts of the case are unnecessary for our determination of the legal questions…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Harry J. Hicks, Administrator of the Estate of Carol Greitens, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  3. Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Jones v. Montefiore HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Durflinger v. ArtilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Gloria Rios v. F. Calvin Bigler, M.D. And Lauren A. Welch, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. Cahoon v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Roberts v. Ohio Permanente Medical Group, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Alexander v. ScheidIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Mohr v. GranthamWashington Supreme Court · 2011

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API