Legal Opinion

Hamil v. Bashline

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 5, 1978No. 97PublishedCited by 512 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

POMEROY, Justice.

The present appeal involves the degree of certainty required of expert medical testimony to establish, in a medical malpractice case, the causal relation between the harm suffered by a plaintiff-patient and the alleged negligence of a doctor or hospital in failing properly to diagnose and treat the plaintiff’s condition in a manner which might have prevented the harm. We believe that such causation may be founded upon expert opinion testimony to the effect that defendant failed to exercise reasonable care in performing an undertaking to render services to…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Harry J. Hicks, Administrator of the Estate of Carol Greitens, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  2. Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Whitner v. LojeskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Majors v. Brodhead HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. Dicky D. Voegeli and Sharon Voegeli v. Harvard R. Lewis and Methodist Hospital, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by512 opinions

  1. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Feld v. MerriamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Delores Simmons, Administratrix of the Estate of Daniel La Friscoe Simmons v. The City of Philadelphia Police Officer A. Panati, Badge No. 2587Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  4. Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  5. Martin v. Johns-Manville Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

507 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API