Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Ohio Permanente Medical Group, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1996No. 95-1042PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

The issue presented in this case is whether Ohio should recognize a claim for loss of chance in a wrongful death action where the decedent had a less than fifty-percent chance of survival. For the following reasons, we answer this question in the affirmative.

I Overview of Loss-of-Chance Theory

In medical malpractice cases, the general rule is that the plaintiff must prove causation through medical expert testimony in terms of probability to establish that the injury was, more likely than not, caused by the defendant’s negligence. Shumaker v. Oliver B. Cannon & Sons,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Harry J. Hicks, Administrator of the Estate of Carol Greitens, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  3. Cooper v. Sisters of Charity of Cincinnati, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. McKellips v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  5. Herskovits v. Group Health CooperativeWashington Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Cahoon v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. White v. LeimbachOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Alexander v. ScheidIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Matsuyama v. BirnbaumMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  5. Gardner v. PawliwSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API