Legal Opinion

Mohr v. Grantham

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 2011No. 84712-6PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.

¶1 Linda Mohr suffered a trauma-induced stroke and is now permanently disabled. She and her husband, Charles, claim that negligent treatment by her health care providers diminished her chances of avoiding or greatly minimizing her disability. In other words, they claim that negligence caused Mrs. Mohr a loss of the chance of a better outcome. In Herskovits v. Group Health Coop*847erative of Puget Sound, 99 Wn.2d 609, 611, 614, 664 P.2d 474 (1983) (Dore, J., lead opinion), this court recognized the lost chance doctrine in a survival action when the plaintiff died following the alleged failure of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Weymers v. KheraMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Harbeson v. Parke-Davis, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Berger v. SonnelandWashington Supreme Court · 2001

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Lakey v. Puget Sound Energy, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Loeffelholz v. University of WashingtonWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Volk v. DeMeerleerWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Woods View II, LLC v. Kitsap CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. FutureSelect Portfolio Management, Inc. v. Tremont Group Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API