Legal Opinion

Cahoon v. Cummings

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 2000No. 79S05-0009-CV-513PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

BOEHM, Justice.

Mayhue v. Sparkman, 653 N.E.2d 1384, 1388-89 (Ind.1995), held that where a patient’s likelihood of recovery is less than fifty percent, but negligent treatment increased the risk of loss, a claim may be asserted for that increased risk. We grant transfer and hold that damages for such a claim are to be measured in proportion to the increased risk, and not by the full extent of the ultimate injury.

Factual and Procedural Background

In December of 1991, William T. Cummings sought the treatment of his family doctor, Dr. Robert W. Kohne, for heartburn-like…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Weymers v. KheraMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. McKellips v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  3. Herskovits v. Group Health CooperativeWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Perez v. Las Vegas Medical CenterNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Roberts v. Ohio Permanente Medical Group, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. Simon v. United StatesIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Loomis v. Ameritech Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Control Techniques, Inc. v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. INS Investigations Bureau, Inc. v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Kelly v. LevandoskiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API