Legal Opinion

Alexander v. Scheid

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2000No. 49S05-0004-CV-231PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PETITION TO TRANSFER

BOEHM, Justice.

The plaintiffs are a married couple who allege medical malpractice in the failure to follow up on a chest x-ray that revealed a nodule in the wife’s lung. When the complaint was filed, the wife had incurred an increased risk of fatal cancer as a result of the delay in diagnosis, but was in remission. This ease addresses whether a claim for medical malpractice may be asserted if the injury has not come to its full potential, and may never do so. We conclude that such a claim may be pursued under the circumstances of this ease.

Factual Background

In June of…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  3. Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Harry J. Hicks, Administrator of the Estate of Carol Greitens, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  5. Shuamber v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1991

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Calvin Thomas v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Bader v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Elmer J. Bailey v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Cahoon v. CummingsIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Lee v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API