Dorman v. Osmose, Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRONE, Judge.
Case Summary
Mark and Tracy Dorman appeal the denial of their motion to correct error following the verdict in favor of Osmose, Inc., on their amended complaint alleging negligence and strict liability. We affirm.
Issues
The Dormans raise three issues, which we restate as follows:
I. Whether the Dormans waived their claim that the trial court abused its discretion in deciding not to replace a juror;
II. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in excluding certain language from Osmose’s brief submitted in a prior appeal; and
III. Whether the trial court abused its…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Purgess v. SharrockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Havert v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
- Short v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway And Park District Of PeoriaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gibson v. BojrabIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Hatter v. Pierce Manufacturing, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- B.M.S. v. E.M.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011