Legal Opinion

Dorman v. Osmose, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 25, 2007No. 53A04-0607-CV-374PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRONE, Judge.

Case Summary

Mark and Tracy Dorman appeal the denial of their motion to correct error following the verdict in favor of Osmose, Inc., on their amended complaint alleging negligence and strict liability. We affirm.

Issues

The Dormans raise three issues, which we restate as follows:

I. Whether the Dormans waived their claim that the trial court abused its discretion in deciding not to replace a juror;

II. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in excluding certain language from Osmose’s brief submitted in a prior appeal; and

III. Whether the trial court abused its…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Purgess v. SharrockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  2. Havert v. CaldwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Short v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Kurek v. Pleasure Driveway And Park District Of PeoriaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gibson v. BojrabIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Hatter v. Pierce Manufacturing, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. B.M.S. v. E.M.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API